Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Final Essay

2. Culture is not neutral: whom does it serve? Discuss with reference to the construction of celebrity.

Introduction

Culture does not merely exist; it is there to benefit and serve a purpose. The celebrity construction culture is not neutral. Celebrities are not born. They are created to serve the needs of the people and the economy. Super Girl is a commodified machine where celebrities are constructed and girls are turned into products to financially and emotionally benefit numerous parties in society.

The celebrity construction machine serves the needs of capitalism. It is a commodified talent search that can be modified by larger machines to be acceptable and suitably sold to audiences all over the world. The cultures are tailored to meet the needs of mass society but at the same time can have strong influence on mainstream culture.


2005 Super Girl top contestants.


Background on Super Girl

Super Girl is a singing contest held annually from 2004 - 2006 by Hunan Satellite Television for aspiring female singers in China. The show primarily follows a similar format to those of the Idol franchise. Different to Idol, auditions for Super Girl were held in several large cities simultaneously. Contestants who make the auditions then go on to compete with others in the same city, with only the top three in each city going to Changsha for the national finals. The contestants are judged by well known Chinese singers and producers, as well as ‘audience judges’ selected from various social backgrounds. Voting was conducted via telephone and text message with each vote costing from 0.5 to 3 Chinese Yuan. Top ten winners of Super Girl in 2005 scored a managing contract with Tian Yu/Sky Entertainment (Luo, n.d.).

The show generated a craze among China’s youth with the 2005 audition of Super Girl attracting more than 120,000 applicants from all over China (Qing, 2005).



Girls waiting outside the Hangzhou competition venue.

The finale of the 2005 Super Girl captured an audience of 400 million (Jakes, 2006), with some 8 million votes casted (Xinhua, 2005). The show is one of the most watched television programs in Chinese history and the top among all Idol format shows (Macartney, 2005).



Finalists awaits voting results at the 2005 Super Girl grand final.


The sponsor of Super Girl paid a reported 14 million Yuan, while five-second commercial slots in the grand final generated 48,000 Yuan and fifteen-second commercial slots were sold for 112,000 Yuan (Luo, n.d.).


Hunan Satellite Television Logo.


Despite the high popularity among the people, Liu Zhongde, China’s former vice-minister of Culture, described the show as ‘vulgar and degrading’ (Xinhua, 2007). The show was accused of ‘discouraging youngsters from living life practically’ (Xinhua, 2007) and having ‘preached the wrong concept of instant riches and fame’ (Xinhua, 2007).

Culture Commodification

Commodity, as described by Marx, is a ‘value in use’, that has the properties to be able to satisfy human needs or the properties are ‘the product of human labour’ (Marx, 1867). The process of commodification then is where ‘man, by his industry, changes the forms of the materials furnished by Nature, in such a way as to make them useful to him’ (Marx, 1867).



“There is a physical relation between physical things. But it is different with
commodities. There, the existence of the things qua commodities, and the
value-relation between the products of labour which stamps them as commodities,
have absolutely no connexion with their physical properties and with the
material relations arising therefrom” (Marx, 1867).

The Idol format reality shows are powerful commodification machines as they create an exchange value through both the creation of a celebrity as well as the celebrity created. Following Marx’s logic of commodification as turning wood into table, the wood in this instance can be seen as the talent quest process as well as the people in the talent quest.

Idol type reality television firstly turns the show of talent (or lack of) and the process of seeking someone with celebrity potential into a television program that is packaged with fun, excitement along with sponsorships and advertisements to be sold to mass audiences. Secondly, the people going through the process of Idol are rapidly turned into celebrities. From a person walking down the street, they’ve become a star that shines with style and personality, and is sold to the mass society.

Commodification of Talent Quest

Many talent quests have developed all over the world pre-Idol. These searches for talents can be seen as a subculture that goes through a process of distortion, legitimization and integration (Ricoeur, 1986) to be commodified into the Idol model and sold all over the world. This involves altering reality (or what it used to be), normalizing reality, and incorporating the ideology with mass society.

l Distortion: The old talent quest model is modified to serve the needs of a wide range of audiences. The process of scouting of someone of celebrity potential has been turned into reality television that auditions a large amount of people, giving them mass exposure. The prizes of winning has also upgraded to record deals and/or monetary rewards.
l Legitimization: The Idol format has normalized the search for the next celebrity through reality shows. The show’s popularity in the UK has led to it being developed and sold to audiences all over the world, with many of them becoming an annual event. The fame of talent quests format reality shows has also led to development of other reality series such as Britain’s Got Talent.
l Integration: The ideologies that integrate Idol culture and mass society are the slogan of ‘everybody can become a star’, as well as the desire of ‘maybe I will be famous someday’. The parallel of ideology with mass society allows the Idol franchise to become a popular commodity that is widely accepted and bought by society.

The concept of a talent search post Idol is more than a quest for good talent. It is a culture industry where people are entertained, stars are made, and billions of dollars are profited all over the world. The commodification of this concept to such extent was achieved through repackaging and selling the Hollywood slogan of ‘everybody can become a star’ to involve the mass audience and be more accepted within different society machines across the globe.

Commodification of Humans

Celebrities are powerful commodities as they are famous and influential. They have large fan bases consisting of loyal consumers who love, idol, and want to be just like them. People who create celebrities are even more powerful. They choose and control these models in society.

The concept of idol fetishism is very significant as celebrities produce extremely strong consumers who blindly devote themselves to the idol.



Li Yuchun and her fans.

In Super Girl, Li Yuchun, the winner of the 2005 season had an extremely organized and almost cult like fellowship. Fans created websites and chat forums dedicated to Li, vigorously protected her when rumours came out, spent all their pocket money on voting for her, and even flocked the streets in major cities to ask strangers/borrowed their mobile phones to vote for their idol. This strong fellowship resulted in Li’s winning with over 3.5 million votes (Xinhua, 2005). Journalist Miao Qing comments that ‘television has rapidly equipped them with the manner of true starts and driven hundred of thousands of people crazy for them’ (Qing, 2005).



“The whole world is made to pass through the filter of the culture industry”
(Adorno & Horkheimer, 1993).


What is shown on television is perceived as ‘normal’, and sets an influential example of behaviour.

Despite most contestants are affected by the Super Girl culture and willingly change to conform to the norms of mainstream culture and plead to be liked, there are contestants who beg to differ. These contestants with strong personalities and differences ultimately can affect the mainstream culture and become norm, as "real life is becoming indistinguishable from the movies" (Adorno & Horkheimer, 1993).

In the 2005 season of Super Girl, the top two contestants are very different to other girls in the
show in terms of their voices and style. They do not follow what has become the guideline of being a beautiful girl, such as growing nice long hair, using make up, wearing pretty dresses etc. These girls have short hair and dress similar to boys. Through this disinformation on the way a girl should dress, new opportunities arise as a new commodity culture is created (or a small subculture commodified and brought to mainstream). With the wide broadcast of the show, the trend of girls dressing boys has developed and affected many Chinese youth’s fashion style.




2005 Super Girl runner up Zhou Bichang.




2005 Super Girl winner Li Yuchun.


2006 Super Girl Li Na.


Culture Modification: Localization of Idol to Super Girl

The Idol franchise has commodified the term ‘talent search’ across the globe. The Idol format reality shows profits billions through selling the Hollywood culture of ‘everyone can become a star’. Super Girl is a machine that spun-off and works similarly to the Idol machine. These are created cultures that act as star developing machines that commodify the process and desire of achieve celebrity status.



“Everywhere it is machines – real ones, not figurative ones: machines driving other machines, machines being driven by other machines, with all the necessary couplings and connections… Something is produced: the effect of a machine, not mere metaphors.” (Deleuze & Guattari, 1983)


A machine, according to Guattari, is made up of regimes, pathways and subjects. In this instance, the Super Girl show is the regime, a system of rules in which competitors have to abide by and the way in which success is determined. The pathway in Super Girl is the set stages of the competition in which contestants have to travel through in order to win and how audiences keep their favourites in the show. The 120,000 contestants are the subjects in Super Girl, and are often modified while going through the pathways and regimes by being told of how to sing, act and/or dress.


2005 Super Girl finalists in depictions of Red Army uniforms.


2005 Super Girl group performance of old, well-known, Chinese song, 'Qing Chun Wu Qu' (Youth Song).

2005 Super Girl group performance of traditional style Chinese song dressed in semi-traditional Chinese clothing (Qi Pao).


The Super Girl machine operates within the larger machine of Chinese culture. In order to make the Super Girl machine a successful commodity and more ‘real’ to Chinese locals, local values and customs are respected and freely expressed through showing auditions by people of all ethnics, and using folk music and choreography. Unlike American Idol’s judges, the Chinese judges do not have such distinct personalities and are often more reserved and less harsh when commenting on the contestants’ performances.

Other machines that have direct influence to the Super Girl culture include the Hunan Satellite TV machine, the Tian Yu (Sky Entertainment) machine and the Chinese government machine.

The Hunan Satellite TV machine and the Tian Yu (Sky Entertainment) machine are the larger machines that work with and have power over the Super Girl machine. These corporations manufacture celebrities through producing reality shows to draw audiences into their Chinese reality entertainment machine while obtaining numerous benefits. The Hunan Satellite TV machine and the Tian Yu (Sky Entertainment) machine created a capitalist commodity industry through reality shows that did not used to exist in China. The culture of reality television they have developed has resulted in billions of dollars in profits as well as drew large numbers of Chinese audiences.

The Chinese government machine is another powerful influence over the Super Girl machine. The Chinese Governments is authoritarian and collectivist. Due to the popularity generated for the created culture of Super Girls, and its democratic voting system, the Government may feel threatened of a culture revolution as the democratic culture of the Super Girl machine may affect the behaviour of the shared subjects within the Chinese government machine and the Super Girl machine (Jakes, 2006). In protection of the regime in which China as a country operates, Super Girl was heavily criticised by the Government. Therefore the ‘revolution’ has failed as "the old forms and structures of organization [took] power" (Guattari, 1984).


The Chinese Government.


Capitalism of Super Girl Culture

The Super Girl series can be described as an "Institution of capitalism that are the consequences of human behaviour that will come back to structure our future behaviour" (Wolff, 2003). Super Girl as a capitalist exploits the contestants, profiting billions through their free performances. Similarly, the girls exploit the reality series to show off their talent and gain as much awareness as possible in order to achieve stardom.

In order to achieve the goal of the created Super Girl culture, as the machinic progression moves forward, both the machine and its subjects need to further exploit each other.

To obtain large amounts of audiences, Super Girl exploits its contestants’ abilities as well as feelings to make the show interesting and exciting. The contestants’ are manipulated and altered. Through the regime and pathway of the Super Girl machine, by the end of the show, contestants are no longer who they were in terms of the way they look, dress, act and sing.




2005 Super Girl top 5 He Jie at the very beginning of the contest.









2005 Super Girl top 5 He Jie at the beginning of the contest.2005 Super Girl top 5 He Jie after the contest.


On the other hand, the contestants use the Super Girl platform to try and convince audiences of their ‘true self’. As the most favoured contestant win, the girls in Super Girl willing changes themselves and say/do things they don’t necessarily agree to in a mere attempt to be liked by the audiences.


Conclusion

Culture is anything but neutral. They are commodities that are created, modified and manipulated to serve the needs of its creator/s. The mass televised talent quest is a created machine that is commodified and sold to audiences worldwide. The Super Girl machine is similar to the Idol machine but modified to fall within the regime of Chinese culture. The show and its contestants are all commodified machines that capitalistically operate together to achieve success through awareness as well as finance.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Bibliography

Adorno, T. & Horkheimer, M. (1993). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. The Cultural Studies Reader, ed. During, S. London & New York: Routledge: 29-43.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, (1st pub 1972), chapter 1: 1-50.

Guattari, F. (1984). Molecular Revolution and Class Struggle. Molecular Revolution: Psychiatry and Politics, R. Sheed (trans.) London: Penguin: 253-261.

Guattari, F. (1995). ‘Regimes, Pathways, Subjects’. Soft Subversions, Lotringer, S. (ed.) New York: Semiotext(e), 112-130.

Jakes, S. (April 3, 2006). China’s Super Girl Needs a Rescue. Time Canada.

Luo, Y. (n.d.). Will the Real “Super Voice Girls” Winner Please Stand Up. China Today. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/English/e2005/e200511/p22.htm

Macartney, J. (2005). TV Talent Conest ‘Too Democratic’ for China’s Censors. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/article560126.ece

Martinsen, J. (April 26, 2006). CPPCC: Exterminate the Super Girls. Danwei. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from http://www.danwei.org/trends_and_buzz/cppcc_exterminate_the_super_girls.php

Marx, K. (1867). The Fetishism of the Commodity and the Secret Thereof. [Das Kapital] Karl Marx Capital: An Abridged Edition, ed. McLellan, D. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999: 42-50, 491.

Qing, Miao. (August 12, 2005). ‘Super Voice Girls’ Challenges China’s TV Culture. China Daily. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005%2D08/12/content%5F468543.htm

Ricoeur, P. (1986). Lecture on Ideology and Utopia.

Screen Machine. (2008). Screen Machine. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from http://screenmachine.wordpress.com/

USA Today. (May 27, 2005). China Under Spell of Mighty ‘Super Girl’. USA Today.

Wolff, J. (2003). Karl Marx. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/

Xinhua. (2005). Li Yuchun Crowns Super Girl. People’s Daily Online. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://english.people.com.cn/200508/28/eng20050828_204953.html

Xinhua. (2007). Strict Rules to Rein in TV Talent Contest. China.org.cn. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://english.hanban.edu.cn/english/entertainment/206331.htm

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Now, the more serious stuff...

This entry is going to be a lot longer than the last and explains the more serious issues behind my little blog presentation... so for all pictures and clips, please refer to previous post, because this is serious...


Discuss national cultural screen productions and their address of the local within a global commodity industry context - case study the Idol franchise, or the global news.

The Idol franchise has created a phenomenon around the world, creating many well-known Idols including Kelly Clarkson, Guy Sebastian, and many more.

This franchise transformed the term 'talent search' from small local singing competitions to massive television productions that profit billions through the process of allowing everyday people to showcase their talent or lack of, to large amounts of audiences.

This type of popular reality show is a manufactured culture that is commodified and is crafted carefully to be successfully sold to audiences all over the world.

The talent show craze arguably started in the UK with the series 'Pop Idol'. The success of the show has led to it be franchised in many countries and large numbers of spin-offs was also created.

The international format of Idol and other similar reality shows, embeds the classic Hollywood culture of ‘everyone can be a star’, and promotes itself as the fast gateway to stardom, selling a life-changing experience. The success of this cross-cultural commodity is arguably similar to the positive responses Australian soap opera ‘Neighbours’ has received in the UK. The soap opera focuses on exporting the ‘Australian way of living’ – suburban housing, egalitarian society and sunny weather (Turner). The show’s popularity amongst the English can be explained that they look up to the Australian lifestyle, as the weather in the UK is usually rainy, gloomy and class is apparent (Turner). Similarly, when related back to Idol, the franchise is so beloved by citizens all over the globe could be resulted from the fact that almost all of us have grew up under the constant influence of the Hollywood celebrity culture, how being a celebrity means fun, excitement and wealth.

The subject of the culture industry in Idol, is an assemblage of Hollywood, talent quest, performance and a whole range of cultures. The way in which all the cultures are fitted together to create something else brings us to the topic of ‘machine’. Guattari terms machinic is ‘precisely this synthesis of heterogeneities as such’ (Deleuze and Guattari, 1987, pp. 330-331, A Thousand Plateaus), which in simple terms, ‘machine’ is basically something functional that was made of pieces fitted together.

Guattari, in his article, mentions regime, pathway and subject. Regime is a set of rules, a system that controls how things are done. Pathway is the way these things are done, and subject is what is going through the regime through the pathway, being moulded and transformed into something different. When this model is placed on Idol, the show itself is like the regime, a functional coordinated program. Idol’s pathway would then be the way of how the television series is created through a search for talent, and how that whole process is commodified. And the Subjects in Idol, are the contestants and audiences who are shaped and altered through Idol’s regime and pathway.

An example of a subject going through the American Idol machine is Kelly Clarkson. First is of her at the primary auditions, a very bubbly American girl-next-door, natural and unpolished. Then she goes through the pathway of Idol, the performances, being judged and altered. And now, she is a superstar, accompanied with heavy make up and expensive clothes, selling million of records and traveling all over the world.

In a global commodity industry context, the Idol franchise followed the steps of globalization and from one phenomenon in a single country created a global industry that profit billions through producing televised talent searches that simply manufacture stars. It has also spread the Hollywood culture of ‘everyone can become a star’ and giving its audience a sense of 'hey, you can do it too'.

In addressing of local in this global commodity industry, Idol and its spin-offs has allowed local citizens participate in this global craze while still catering to local tastes of what is talent and the local translation as to how the show should be like. The show would not be reality to audiences it was just the same American Idol broadcasted all over the world, even if it used different language voiceovers. It is the local culture that the show embeds in it that makes the local version of Idol a reality series to the locals. Locals want to see locals on the show; it is this identity that makes the show realistic.

Talent shows in similar formats to Pop Idol from different countries include American Idol (USA), Indian Idol, Super Girls (China), One Million Star (Taiwan), Search for the Next Pussycat Doll (USA), Nouvelle Star (France) and more.

The shows are all supposedly aimed at searching for great talents across the countries and let them be heard. However, in catering to the taste of the audience in different cultures, performances throughout the shows vary.

Here are some examples of Idol, and similar spin-offs from all over the world.

Australian Idol

Run in extremely similar format to American Idol, Australian Idol offers audiences the Australian culture through the locals who audition, and the cultural icons that the performances are held at. A great example of culture is characters like Shannon Nole, the outback-Australian farmer boy who grew up singing in a band with his brothers.

Search for the Next Pussycat Doll

This search for talent differs from the normal Idol as it is specific in what they are looking for and to whom the show caters. Search for the Next Pussycat Doll is primarily targeted at Pussycat Doll fans, and as the group itself has a sexy image, the performances are slightly raunchier as well.

One Million Stars

One Million Stars is an Idol spin-off from Taiwan. A popular host who is very well known in South East Asian countries hosts the show and contestants on One Million Stars are judged by icons of Taiwan pop. Some of the performances are done using the local dialect, and old folk songs that showcases the Taiwan cultures. Following the creative culture of Taiwan, it is also encouraged on the show to be innovative, and it seems to be a new 'cool' in Taiwan to create music through combining mainstream pop with slightly older music.

Super Girls

The show very successfully embedded the local culture and captured large amounts of audiences all over the country primarily through the selections it held across all the major cities of China. Unlike other Idols, in a country with as large of a population as China, Super Girls not only held auditions in the major cities, but also has separate contests in the cities in order to screen the numbers down. Only the top three of each segment was allowed to participate in the finals held in Hunan. The show also showcases the Chinese culture well through allowing multicultural participants who performed songs from their own village. In addition, many segments of the contest required contestants to sing Chinese folk songs from different parts of China in a display of culture in contrast to the chart music contestants normally sing, as parts the older generations of Chinese audiences do not regard pop music as 'real music'.

Indian Idol

Indian is famous for their Bollywood culture, the fun dances and the happy songs. Indian Idol blends this culture into their shows using performances that are very ‘Bollywood’ in style.

Also, through differences in culture, rejections and opinions may be projected differently. An example could be drawn from two rejections, one from Idol spin-off, Super Girl in China, and another one from American Idol.

Super Girl

Translation: The second girl that was rejected, the judges suggested her to audition to be a DJ, and said 'you will definitely be chosen' instead of being straightforward and telling her that you cannot sing.

American Idol

After listening to a couple lines, Simon tells the girl 'you can't sing', very straight forward.

The difference is clear, in Super Girl, despite the contestant’s total lack of talent, the judges used a more reserved approach explain to the girl she cannot sing without hurting her. While on the other hand, Simon is very cruel and straightforward, as it is what’s required to gain the ratings in America.

Without this embed of culture in the local versions of Idol, consumers will feel more distant from the show and Idol will be less likely to succeed as consumer will feel it is a staged production, a soap series that is not ‘real’. For example, Australia could not succeed in producing a local version of Punk’d, the reality show hosted by Ashton Kutcher playing pranks on celebrities in the U.S. Australia just do not have the celebrity filled environment like LA and we do not have that many famous stars to play pranks on.

In conclusion, Idol is a global franchise with a local touch, just like the McDonald’s in Japan has Tamago Double Mac and KFC in some parts of Korea sell salads instead of chips. The Idol machine runs in very similar formats all around the world, but the local culture embedded into the shows are what really makes the series Reality TV.

References

DELEUZE, G. and GUATTARI, F. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Vol.2. Trans. by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota

Turner, G. 2005. Cultural Identity, Soap Narrative, and Reality TV. Television & New Media Nov2005, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p415-422.

Monday, March 17, 2008

My Blog Presentation

Week 2: machine

Discuss national cultural screen productions and their address of the local within a global commodity industry context - case study the Idol franchise, or the global news.



The Idol franchise, a manufactured culture, has created many well-known names all over the world. These world famous talents include Kelly Clarkson, Guy Sebastian, and many more.



The talent show craze arguably started in the UK with the series 'Pop Idol'. The success of the show has led to it been franchised in many countries and a large number of spin-offs was also created.

In relations to Guattari’s article, from my understanding, the Idol show is the Regime, a machine, a system that has set rules on how things are done. Pathway, is the case of Idol would be the way of how the television series is created through a search for talent, and how that whole process is commodified. And the Subjects in Idol, are the contestants, who are moulded and transformed by the Regime through the Pathways.

An example here is Kelly Clarkson,

Here is her at the auditions, very, let's say raw, unpolished, your girl next door.


Then, there is the Idol transformation,


And now, she is a superstar, selling millions of records!


The Idol franchise transformed the term 'talent search' from small local singing competitions to massive television productions that profit billions through the process of allowing everyday people to showcase their talent or lack of, to large amounts of audiences.





In a global commodity industry context, the Idol franchise created a global industry that profit billions through producing televised talent searches that simply manufacture stars. It has also spread the Hollywood culture of ‘everyone can become a star’ and giving its audience a sense of 'hey, you can do it too'.



In addressing of local in this global commodity industry, Idol and its spin-offs has allowed local citizens participate in this global craze while still catering to local tastes of what is talent and the local translation as to how the show should be like.



Talent shows in similar formats to Pop Idol from different countries include American Idol (USA), Indian Idol, Super Girls (China), One Million Star (Taiwan), Search for the Next Pussycat Doll (USA), Nouvelle Star (France) and more.


















The shows are all supposedly aimed at searching for great talents across the countries and let them be heard. However, in catering to the taste of the audience in different cultures, performances throughout the shows vary.

Here are some clips of Idol, and similar spin-offs from all over the world,

Nouvelle Star

Search for the Next Pussycat Doll
- the show primarily caters for Pussycat Doll fans, and as the group itself has a sexy image, the performances are slightly more raunchy too.

One Million Star
- the performance uses the local dialect, and old folk songs which shows the Taiwan culture. And it also seems to be a new 'cool' to create music through combining mainstream pop with slightly older music.

Super Girls
- the show has segments where contestants are to sing old Chinese folk songs from different parts of China in a display of culture in contrast to the chart music contestants normally sing, as parts the older generations of Chinese audiences do not regard pop music as 'real music'.

Indian Idol
- this part of the show blends in the Indian 'Bollywood' music culture with the Idol 'Hollywood' culture.

Pinoy Idol

Also, through differences in culture, rejections and opinions may be projected differently.

Here are two examples of rejections, one from Idol spin-off, Super Girl in China, and another one from American Idol.

Super Girl
* Translation: the second girl that was rejected, the judges suggested her to audition to be a DJ, and said 'you will definitely be chosen'.

American Idol

The difference is clear, in Super Girl, no matter how bad the contestants were (at least I think there was a total lack of talent), the judges used a more reserved approach to tell the girl 'I don't think you can sing'. On the other hand, Simon just tell the girl 'you can't sing'. Very straight forward.

In conclusion, Idol is a global franchise with a local touch, just like McDonald’s in Japan have Tamago Double Mac, KFC in some parts of Korea sell salads instead of chips (yes, it's true). The Idol system is very similar all around the world, but the local culture embedded into the shows are what really makes the series Reality TV to locals.